Date: July 2026
Artificial intelligence is reshaping public education, bringing tremendous opportunities and legitimate concerns. As a former Alameda Board of Education member for 12 years, I believe AI should be governed thoughtfully so our students benefit from personalized learning while schools protect privacy, promote equity, preserve meaningful human relationships, and teach responsible AI use. Technology should empower great teacher - not replace them - and every decision should put students, educators, and families first.
As a 45-year Alameda resident, I understand our community's values, traditions, and educational priorities. My son and two daughters graduated from Alameda public schools, and today five of my grandchildren are continuing that tradition. I want every Alameda student to have the same opportunities my own family has enjoyed through our public schools.
Strong schools begin with excellent teachers, responsible governance, and meaningful partnerships with families. Together, we can ensure Alameda's schools continue to prepare every student to thrive in a rapidly changing world. I would be honored to earn your trust and your vote.
Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming part of everyday life. As our
community considers its future role in education, these frequently asked
questions are intended to provide information and encourage thoughtful
community discussion.
Artificial intelligence is becoming part of everyday life—from search
engines and customer service to healthcare and the workplace. Students will
graduate into a world where AI is commonplace. Our responsibility is to
understand both its opportunities and challenges before making important
decisions about its role in education.
No.
Great teaching depends on relationships, experience, judgment, creativity,
and understanding each student's unique needs. AI cannot replace those
qualities. The goal is to explore whether AI can reduce routine
administrative work so teachers can spend more time teaching, mentoring, and
connecting with students.
No.
Classroom teachers remain at the center of learning. Any future use of AI
should support—not replace—high-quality instruction and meaningful human
interaction.
Because our students will use AI throughout their lives.
Just as schools teach students to use calculators, computers, and the
internet responsibly, we should help students understand how to use AI
safely, ethically, and effectively.
Potential benefits include:
Whether and how these benefits are realized depends on thoughtful
implementation and ongoing evaluation.
Many community members have legitimate questions about:
These concerns deserve careful consideration before significant decisions
are made.
This should not be decided by the school board alone.
Students, parents, teachers, staff, administrators, and community members
all deserve a voice. Community dialogue should guide any future policies and
practices.
Not necessarily.
Teachers have different instructional styles and varying levels of
experience with technology. Professional development and support should help
educators learn about AI at their own pace while respecting professional
judgment.
Learning remains the goal.
Students still need to develop critical thinking, writing, mathematics,
creativity, communication, and problem-solving skills. AI should be used in
ways that strengthen learning rather than replace it.
No.
AI can make mistakes, produce inaccurate information, and reflect biases
found in its training data. Students and educators must learn to verify
information and think critically rather than accepting AI responses at face
value.
Not necessarily.
Many AI tools already exist, while others may not be appropriate for
schools. The first step is understanding the opportunities, risks, and
educational value before making decisions about investments.
Protecting student information must remain a top priority.
Any AI tools considered by the district should comply with applicable
privacy laws and district policies, with careful attention to data
security, transparency, and responsible use.
The Board's role is to provide governance.
That means asking thoughtful questions, engaging the community,
establishing clear policies, protecting students, supporting educators, and
ensuring that any future use of AI aligns with Alameda's educational values.
Waiting may seem safer, but AI is evolving quickly.
Learning from other districts is valuable, but Alameda should also engage
in its own conversations so we can make informed decisions based on our
community's needs/values rather than reacting after changes are already widespread.
The first step is conversation.
Before making significant decisions, Alameda should engage students,
teachers, families, staff, and community members in an open discussion
about the opportunities, concerns, and safeguards surrounding artificial
intelligence in education.
"Artificial intelligence isn't the goal. Better education is the goal."
Our responsibility is to ensure that any future use of AI supports students,
empowers teachers, protects privacy, promotes equity, and reflects the
values of the Alameda community.
Disclaimer: This website is the sole responsibility of Mike McMahon. It does not represent any official opinions, statement of facts or positions of the Alameda Unified School District. Its sole purpose is to disseminate information to interested individuals in the Alameda community. FAIR USE NOTICEFrequently Asked Questions About Artificial Intelligence in Alameda Schools
1. Why are we talking about artificial intelligence now?
2. Is AI going to replace teachers?
3. Is Alameda planning to replace classroom instruction with AI?
4. Why should our schools even consider AI?
5. What benefits could AI provide?
6. What are the biggest concerns?
7. Who should decide how AI is used?
8. Will every teacher have to use AI?
9. Will students stop learning if they use AI?
10. Is AI always correct?
11. Does supporting AI mean buying expensive technology?
12. How will student privacy be protected?
13. What role should the Board of Education play?
14. Why not simply wait until other districts figure this out?
15. What happens next?
Guiding Principle
Comments. Questions. Broken links? Bad spelling! Incorrect Grammar? Let me know at webmaster.
Last modified: July, 2026
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.