Home

Mike McMahon AUSD
BOE Meetings Assessment Facilities FinancesFavorite Links

Hesperia USD Shows Leadership to Catch Students Before They Fall

by Dr. Jim Huckeba, Director, Special Services, Hesperia unified School District

Since implementing this program, Hesperia USD has seen a 64% decrease in the number of elementary students who are in the resource specialist program, while seeing an average of 159 API growth points across all of our elementary schools.

For the last eight years, the Hesperia Unified School District has been involved in a process called ExCEL (Excellence: a Commitment to Every Learner) which is a research-based early intervention, prevention, and acceleration approach aimed at addressing the needs of all students, regardless of their label. ExCEL is based on the belief that all students can learn and that all educators are responsible for working collaboratively to meet the learning needs of all students. Our reason for moving in this direction was based on the belief that our educational system, with the differentiation between regular education and special education, was not an efficient or effective way to utilize all of our resources.

The traditional special education service delivery model re-quired that a student be identified as having a disability before he or she could receive specialized services. Since the majority of students (52% in the state of California) were identified as specific learning disabled, and had to have a one and one-half standard deviation discrepancy between ability and achievement in order to receive services, it was necessary for our students to fail, often for multiple years, before they ever became eligible to receive services they needed to be successful in school. That “wait to fail” model was one of the concerns expressed by the President’s Commission on Excellence in Special Education. This commission acted in an advisory capacity to the reauthori-zation to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

This I.Q. achievement discrepancy approach has been re-viewed extensively by noted researchers such as Dr. Reid Lyon, Dr. James Ysseldyke, and many others. It was found to result in the delay of needed services and, in some cases, actually denied needed services to students who were not being successful in school. Consequently, when the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 was passed and signed into law, one of the major changes that occurred was designed to address that “wait to fail” I.Q. achievement discrepancy for the learning disabilities category. Instead, Congress authorized the use of the response to intervention approach to determine eligi-bility for the learning disabilities category of special education. When you review the approach that is taken through ExCEL, it becomes clear that ExCEL is a response to interven-tion approach for which we have eight years of data to indicate that we are being successful in improving the academic achieve-ment for all of our students, regardless of their labels.

The basic premise behind ExCEL takes what we believe to be the best aspects of special education and applies those aspects to all students. Those aspects are: assessment to determine present levels of performance; identification of what we need to teach; and systematic and direct instruction to teach them what they need to learn. We believe that all students should be evaluated to determine their current levels of functioning in the basic skills areas of reading and math. This evaluation would not be the type of evaluation that a psychologist would use to determine special education eligibility, but would be the type of evaluation that all of our teachers use on a routine basis in their classrooms. These are the evaluations tied to the basal series or the curriculum-based evaluations that are used to determine the functional levels of students by teachers in all schools.

Our scaffolding blocks of time are called the ExCEL blocks and during these two blocks (usually one hour per day, five days per week), the additional support people at any school are brought into the lowest scaffolded group to bring down the adult-to-student ratio for those students so that they can pro-vide direct instruction to the students most in need of additional support. This scaffolding is done regardless of student labels, so that students receive the academic intervention remediation and/or acceleration that they need based upon their individual performance. Additional support people at a site could be com-prised of a Resource Specialist Program (RSP) teacher and an RSP instructional assistant; a Special Day Class (SDC) teacher and/or instructional assistant; and English Language Learner or Title One support people. The concept here is to work together collaboratively to meet the needs of all students regardless of whether or not they qualify for special education.The rest of the day, excluding these two blocks of ExCEL time, students are heterogeneously grouped back into their home rooms, where they receive standards-based instruction at grade level so that they can be prepared to meet the California content standards. Some of the benefits of utilizing this ap-proach are that students do not have to wait until they fail to receive additional support services that they need, and we do not have to worry about students falling through the cracks. We provide support based upon their assessed instructional need, and not according to whether or not they meet a preconceived eligibility standard for additional support.

We are very proud of the results our students have achieved and the efforts that our teachers have made in working to-gether collaboratively to meet the needs of students regardless of labels. We have done presentations at numerous state and national conferences over the past five years, and have hosted more than 100 school district visitations in the past three years. These visiting school districts have subsequently requested that teams of our teachers work directly with their teachers to assist in developing their own ExCEL plans. We have assisted over 100 school sites in developing their own plans. These school sites are reporting significantly improved results and are seeing increased levels of focus and time on task as well as the staff working collaboratively to plan instruction.

Contact Jim Huckeba at 760-244-4411, ext 209, or at james.huckebo@hesperia.org>.

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding ExCEL

What is ExCEL?

ExCEL is an acronym for "Excellence: A Commitment to Every Learner". It is a hybrid of research-based best practices that have proven to be effective with all students including those with academic deficits. ExCEL is not a program. It is not a canned set of strategies that can be implemented in every school in every district. ExCEL summarizes the belief that all children can learn and we can ensure the success of every child.

What are the core elements of ExCEL?

ExCEL focuses on five primary focus areas which are as follows:

  1. Early intervention and prevention strategies in reading
  2. Emphasis on behavior intervention and remediation
  3. Parent involvement in a family/system focus
  4. Speech and language mastery
  5. Emphasis on intermediate/secondary survival skills

How can the core elements of ExCEL be implemented in my classroom?

The core elements of ExCEL can be implemented through the following structures:

  1. Family Support
  2. Scaffolded Classrooms
  3. Learning Centers
  4. Coordinated Conference Teams

Must all elements of ExCEL be implemented together?

No. ExCEL is composed of elements that stand alone. Some school sites may not need components of ExCEL. Schools should be free to mix and match the components of ExCEL as needed according to the needs of each site.

Is ExCEL beneficial only for students with disabilities?

No. Actually, the research shows that a collaborative service delivery model, which is the primary delivery model, is more beneficial for general education students that for students with disabilities.

One of the components of ExCEL is a scaffolded classroom where students are placed according to academic performance for the purposes of early intervention. Isn't this tracking?

"Tracking", or the placement of students in separate classrooms for the purpose of addressing deficits in core academic areas, is a dead end street. Since students are removed from their classrooms they tend to fall further and further behind their chronological-aged peers. Scaffolded classrooms, however, use homogenous groupings of students for the purpose of intensive early intervention help that they need. Individual cases are staffed each week by the coordinated coference team to insure that students are not trapped in a lower fucntioning class.

Our district has been successfully implmenting the AVID program for years. If we adopt ExCEL do we have to give up this high effective program in favor of ExCEL?

No. ExCEL is not a methodology or strategy. If you district has an intervention that is working there no need to change. However, if a district is not utilizing research-based instructional strategies, SELPA has some suggestions for strategies that work.

Will special education classes be eliminated if my district implements ExCEL?

Although fewer students will be referred to special education because we are able to catch the student earlier in intensive efforts, the continuum of placement options is still guaranteed in the Federal law.

ExCEL proposes to lower the adult-to-student ratio in the scaffolded classroom by utilizing categorically funded personnel to serve all students regardless of whether or not they qualify for specific categorical programs. Is this legal?

Yes. Under the School Site Plan or School-Based Coordinated Plan, a school is allowed to specify the manner in which all categorically funded students' needs wil be met. The SELPA has developed model language to assist school site councils in properly addressing these issues under existing California law.

TOP

Comments. Questions. Broken links? Bad spelling! Incorrect Grammar? Let me know at webmaster.
Last modified: April 17, 2006

Disclaimer: This website is the sole responsibility of Mike McMahon. It does not represent any official opinions, statement of facts or positions of the Alameda Unified School District. Its sole purpose is to disseminate information to interested individuals in the Alameda community.

FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my effort to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.